Feeds:

News: Atom | RSS
Reviews: Atom | RSS
PocketLint: Atom | RSS

What Are Feeds?

Mobius Member Judge, 2007 Smartphone & Pocket PC Magazine Best Software Awards

Please Support our Sponsors!

Features

The Zen of. . . Windows Mobile

April 13, 2006

If you’ve been in the mobile space for any length of time, you already know how that sentence is supposed to end. After all, we’ve been talking about the “zen of Palm” for years now. But my recent experiences with Windows Mobile 5 have led me to change the way that sentence ends, at least for me.

Please understand that I haven’t suddenly turned into a Microsoft “fangirl” or groupie. I’ve used and enjoyed their products for many years, most notably Windows XP and Microsoft Office, but have never felt comfortable with their mobile product offerings. In part that is due to the fact that Palm was first in my consciousness—first to market (I had never even heard of the Newton), and the makers of my first handheld, the Palm IIIx. I used and loved that PDA and its many successors over the years—the IIIc, m505, Sony Clie NR70, Tungsten T, Tapwave Zodiac, and finally the palmOne LifeDrive.

When I was invited to Microsoft’s Mobius event in 2001 I got my first opportunity to try out what was then called the Pocket PC operating system. I honestly tried to switch at that point, because I was simply blown away by the hardware and features—gorgeous bright screens, voice recorder, even Block Recognizer, which made it much easier for this Graffiti-lover to enter text without learning a new system. Unfortunately the Pocket PC in 2001 was also plagued by extremely poor battery life, larger/heavier devices than their Palm OS counterparts, and Outlook—both the desktop and Pocket versions of which I simply despised. I decided after a long trial that I preferred the Palm OS platform and went back to my trusty m505.

Fast forward to 2006, when I was basically happy with my Palm OS existence but beginning to be plagued with a few more handheld issues. While I loved the LifeDrive when I got it, I came to realize that it really wasn’t fulfilling my needs. Sure, it has a built-in hard drive, but I really wasn’t using it that much—a 1GB SD card was all I needed to hold all my pictures and ebooks. That same hard drive also made the device bigger and heavier (which I knew going in) and also much slower. I tried to ignore the slowdown, but I kept getting those little thoughts in the back of my mind that asked why I had to wait to get my personal information when my “old” devices from several years ago (with slower processors) were much more responsive and more fun to use.

I thought about the Pocket PC (now Windows Mobile) platform several times over the years, but only in passing. After all, I read all the stories about how Microsoft’s mobile OS was hopelessly bloated, about how it takes more taps to do things, and of course about how there are literally thousands of Palm OS applications to choose from, many free, that far outstripped the more limited selection of software available for Pocket PC.

In effect I had become a Palm OS “fangirl” in the sense that I had dismissed the competition without really giving it a closer look and honestly evaluating whether or not the devices and software met my needs.

In late January I decided to purchase a Dell Axim X51v for a variety of reasons. The foremost was the fact that I was tired of having to turn down review opportunities for the site because I didn’t have the right device to run the software that I was being offered. Since I expanded the focus of the site in April 2005 to include not just PDA-related news and reviews, but mobile technology of all kinds, such as iPod, digital photography, and portable gaming consoles like the Nintendo DS and Sony PSP, it was just plain stupid of me to limit myself strictly to Palm OS handhelds. I chose the Dell because it seemed to be the best device for my needs based on size and weight, memory capacity, dual wireless (WiFi and Bluetooth), dual card slots, voice recorder, and VGA screen. I figured that I would still use my LifeDrive as my “daily driver” PDA and use the Dell strictly for software and accessory reviews, etc.

What I found though was that the more I used the device and learned about its capabilities, the more I simply loved it! Windows Mobile 5 is not the “dark side” of mobile computing, as Palm OS users have joked about for years. In fact, I found it to be a highly polished experience that simply works, at least for me. Why?


I still use my LifeDrive for reviews and such, and will continue to keep a close eye on the Palm OS side of things as far as accessories and software are concerned. If Palm or another one of the Access licensees comes out with something that blows my socks off, I’ll switch in a heartbeat. After all, it’s just a tool, be it a LifeDrive, a Windows Mobile device, a Blackberry, a smartphone, or something not so “mobile” at all, like an ultraportable laptop or even one of the new Microsoft UMPCs. “Fangirl”or “fanboy” debates like Coke vs. Pepsi vs. Dr. Pepper, Windows vs. Mac, paper vs. plastic, or PlayStation vs. XBox vs. GameCube, just don’t do anyone any good at all. We all have our favorites, and it’s great to support what we believe in, but that’s not the most important thing.

The whole point of this is to be productive and secondarily to be entertained (ebooks, games, music, video). Right now, the best device for me is the Dell Axim X51v. But who know what it will be six months from now? Whatever that tool is for me personally, I’ll still provide the best device, software, and accessory reviews that I can, and hope that in some small way you’ll find them useful as well. That’s what being the PocketGoddess is all about.

Category: Features
Published: April 13, 2006 11:25 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.pocketgoddess.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/331


Comments

1. Andy on April 14, 2006 7:56 PM said...

I think The PPC vs. Palm OS question has been largely settled and isn't so controversial as it used to be. People are rather blaze about it. It's pretty strange considering the amount of flame it generates only 8 months ago.



2. EuroClie on April 15, 2006 7:25 AM said...

Quite an interesting read!

I've been following a similar path (PalmOS devices initially, and now a WM5 device, a Qtek 9100) though I did spend one year with a Linux PDA as well (Sharp Zaurus C3000) which was a great mini-computer but a poor PDA.

I do agree with you on most points, although I have, as can be expected, a different view in some areas.

For a start, I've never used Outlook (yes, I do use The Bat! too ) in the past, and having to use it, even if it's only to be able to backup my PIM data, is still a pain after a few months use. Definitely too bloated and complicated for me...

And if only I could get completely rid of that ActiveSync account in the messaging application! But no, even if I don't use it (I prefer to get mail through my favorite set of POP3 accounts directly), I still have to waste some screen real estate and memory.

Now about the categories, I certainly can understand why some people would love to affect multiple categories to one agenda or address book entry, though I still don't use that feature, but what really annoys me is that the categories are shared by all the PIM apps!

I do realize that having used PalmOS first, with its limitations, has somehow "twisted" my mind to adapt, but I would definitely appreciate not to have my addressbook categories cluttered by useless categories, for instance...

I mean, if I want to have a different icon when displaying my agenda (using Pocket Informant's icons) for rest (days off) days and holidays, no problem, I just need to create two different categories and create an all day even with the associated category. But why should I have to scroll through those two categories in my address book, if I never use them in this application?

IMHO, multiple categories is a good thing, but sharing them through all the PIM apps is not. Of course, YMMV... Wink

Otherwise, yes, PPC in its WM5 incarnation has matured quite a bit, and the overal hardware/software combo has become (in some cases, depending on one's needs and priorities) more interesting than the PalmOS competitors. Who would have thought that someday I'd write a sentence like this, too!



3. EuroClie on April 15, 2006 7:26 AM said...

Quite an interesting read!

I've been following a similar path (PalmOS devices initially, and now a WM5 device, a Qtek 9100) though I did spend one year with a Linux PDA as well (Sharp Zaurus C3000) which was a great mini-computer but a poor PDA.

I do agree with you on most points, although I have, as can be expected, a different view in some areas.

For a start, I've never used Outlook (yes, I do use The Bat! too ) in the past, and having to use it, even if it's only to be able to backup my PIM data, is still a pain after a few months use. Definitely too bloated and complicated for me...

And if only I could get completely rid of that ActiveSync account in the messaging application! But no, even if I don't use it (I prefer to get mail through my favorite set of POP3 accounts directly), I still have to waste some screen real estate and memory.

Now about the categories, I certainly can understand why some people would love to affect multiple categories to one agenda or address book entry, though I still don't use that feature, but what really annoys me is that the categories are shared by all the PIM apps!

I do realize that having used PalmOS first, with its limitations, has somehow "twisted" my mind to adapt, but I would definitely appreciate not to have my addressbook categories cluttered by useless categories, for instance...

I mean, if I want to have a different icon when displaying my agenda (using Pocket Informant's icons) for rest (days off) days and holidays, no problem, I just need to create two different categories and create an all day even with the associated category. But why should I have to scroll through those two categories in my address book, if I never use them in this application?

IMHO, multiple categories is a good thing, but sharing them through all the PIM apps is not. Of course, YMMV... Wink

Otherwise, yes, PPC in its WM5 incarnation has matured quite a bit, and the overal hardware/software combo has become (in some cases, depending on one's needs and priorities) more interesting than the PalmOS competitors. Who would have thought that someday I'd write a sentence like this, too!



4. beecher on April 15, 2006 9:32 AM said...

Goddess, welcome to light side of the power! Wink



5. craigdts on April 15, 2006 9:07 PM said...

try a palm treo 650 and then tell me if u still prefer a WM experience to a palm experience.



6. Onyx on April 15, 2006 11:49 PM said...

Hmm... well, I've written off Palm OS a long time ago. I'm a Symbian man now. But I have a hard time when I hear "I’ve used and enjoyed their products for many years, most notably Windows XP and Microsoft Office..." to actually take the account of PPC as being a good OS. XP (Windows in general) and Office have been the bane of my existence for many years. My switch goes the other way. After years of being confined to the Office suite and switching to other more user friendly and stable suites, after many years of crashes, viruses, spyware, adware, and loss of data, I've switched to the Mac OS. Can't imagine relying on Windows Mobile for my phonel my one and only voice device. No way.



7. jarekt on April 16, 2006 7:05 AM said...

The point is WM5 market is very dynamic - all hardware and software producers as well as OS development team works hard every day fighting for bigger market share. Your Axim is an awsome device and it's still one of the best of so it's hard to compare to some old PalmOS devices (all you've mentioned are old actually Tongue). There are 10 times more companies involwed in WM5 devices market than those connected with PalmOS (even PalmOne makes WM5 Treo device) so even now huge gap betwen WM and Palm devices will get bigger and bigger every month. It's sad actually couse I hate monopols but I love my PPC phone and I can't complain seeing all this progress around me. I've specific needs but even now I have more than 3 devices to choose from and that's what make me happy with "the dark side of the force" Smile



8. Marcos on April 16, 2006 5:30 PM said...

How much has Bill paid you? Wink

No, really. I love my E2, but I'm sure the PocketPC that are sold nowadays are good devices, too. The day I'll have to buy a new one, I'll think it twice.



9. Zan on April 16, 2006 10:43 PM said...

I think the biggest problem with WM right now is still the way they handle multithreading.

On a desktop, it is perfectly reasonable to expect all applications to stay running all the time. However, on a mobile platform, this is just silly. Now, add on the fact that many (heck, maybe even most) applications don't have an exit feature, and that the little (X) in the corner doesn't actually exit applications, you have a real mess.

Other than that, WM has some killer features that Palm is still five years behind on.

Palm did this the right way, by having applications have to specifically request multithreading, and by having the ability to have only PARTS of an application multithread.

I don't know how many times I've seen WM users have to reboot their PDA because the memory was filling up -- it seems downright stupid.



10. Bill on April 16, 2006 11:55 PM said...

I just picked up a LifeDrive, and I believe that its size end weight is an advantage over lighter weight models. I considered a Dell v51 but ultimately one reason I chose a LifeDrive was because it felt more substantial...



11. Dave Haupert on April 17, 2006 8:22 AM said...

Nice article- you bring up some great points and good tips on software to try. I've attempted to switch to Windows Mobile as my primary device several times now. As a Bat! user myself as well, the email part on WM is always a downer, and I never have found a need for the today screen even with the plugins I've seen available.

I also use the Todo list of Palm quite often and like that you can add items in place. While there are some features I would like to see in it, the simplicity and speed are key for me.

What really makes me long for WM though is the multitasking. I use a Treo 650 and when I load up a web page, it takes forever. I'd love to be able to do other things while that's happening.
That's really tempted me to the Treo 700W with the EV-DO connection. But the low res screen kills that device for me, IMO. If it were 480x480 I'd probably already own one.

As a developer I'll say that Palm has really killed themselves- the cobbled updates on APIs make what used to be a write once work everywhere (well, on Palm OS devices, anyway) approach something of the distant past. And there are so many NVFS bugs that are never being fixed by Palm, Inc, it's hard for a developer to explain these to customers and keep saying 'it's not our fault'!

I always think that when the right device comes along I'll be switching again. I have an Axim X50v that I purchased the WM5 upgrade for (which I had to go back due to it being almost unusable after the upgrade), which I use to test our HanDBase software and to try apps that look interesting, but hopefully a killer device will come along that warrants trying another switch again!




12. PocketGoddess [TypeKey Profile Page] on April 17, 2006 9:26 AM said...

craigdts-- Yes, I have used a Treo 650, and a Treo 600, and even a Kyocera 7135. The problem is that you're comparing apples and oranges, and I'm just not interested in converged devices. I'd much rather have a big screen device than a tiny square screen that isn't much fun for reading ebooks or playing games or even trying to get the "big picture" when scanning my weekly or monthly calendar. I'd rather carry a fully-featured PDA and a cheap low-end phone any day of the week.

Onyx--sorry to hear you've had so many problems! I've thought many times about switching to a Mac, because I'm attracted to the "coolness" of it, but my work with handhelds and such basically requires a Windows-based computer, because so many of the desktop apps for handheld programs do NOT support the Mac. I'm also NOT a power user when it comes to the desktop--as long as I can write my articles, edit pictures, and do email/web, I'm fine. I don't do any programming or anything much more advanced, and my paranoia regarding firewall/virus protection/backups has kept me safe so far--I've never had a virus or spyware problem of any kind, and never lost a bit of data. IOW Windows is right for me, but I'm also glad that others can choose Mac, Linux, etc.



13. Philippe Radley on April 17, 2006 4:53 PM said...

I am not surprised that you prefer the Dell to the LifeDrive. I think the LD was a blunder - and its poor sales indicate I have a lot of company: it's a clunky slow machine that, incredibly, uses a hard drive rather than solid state memory. The moment I handled it I knew it was not for me. I waited and bought the T/X which is a perfectly fine successor to my T3. My wife has an HP 4700 which, like the Axim, has a beautiful screen. But Outlook on a handheld! Not for me! Outlook was never designed for a small screen, nor were any of the MS applications. Often when I show my wife something from Agendus, such as the linking of contacts, she is impressed. The linking in Outlook is simply terrible on a handheld, it does not with one click show all the info on the linked contact, so it is useless. As for icons, I find them very efficient, since they replace words which take more space and more time to enter. BUT the T/X is relatively slow and the screen is unreadable in broad daylight (the 4700's and the Axim's are marvelous in daylight). I wish there were an ideal handheld, but I haven't found it. In any case, the next handheld device I buy will be a converged device, so that I have the option of carrying only one device with me. Good luck with your Axim. Philippe Radley



14. Martin on April 21, 2006 3:42 AM said...

Having come from the "Palm" stable I can sympathise with your views completely. I certainly held the view that Palm was good and PPC was bad, mainly because that was the view on many Palm related message boards.

After having tha fantastic T3 I upgraded to a T5 which was basically a machine that could not work for more than 20 mins at a time and needed many hard resets. Palm's reluctance to help/take the T5 back encouraged me to try a PPC phone (very cheap starting cost). My experience with an O2 XDA IIs was very very good. When the XDA Exec with WM5 came out I was able to get a free upgrade.

The machine is something of a brick, but a great device. The OS can be critisised for being slow at times but it is a far better machine than my old T3.

I am still on Yahoo's TX forum and that looks like the machine the T5 should have been.

Unlikely I'll ever go back to Palm OS but the important thing is that we have a choice.

As a believer of the PDA/phone combination I am interested to see how the PPC version of Palm's Treo evolves!!



Post a comment




Remember Me?


some recipes